Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repository.khpa.edu.ua//jspui/handle/123456789/3491
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Prepotenska, Maryna | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ovsiankina, Liudmyla | - |
dc.contributor.author | Smyrnova, Tetiana | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rasskazova, Olha | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cherednyk, Lidiia | - |
dc.contributor.author | Doichyk, Maksym | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-23T09:24:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-23T09:24:27Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.khpa.edu.ua//jspui/handle/123456789/3491 | - |
dc.description | Tolerance as a Communicative and Socio-Cultural Strategy of Social Agreements / M. Prepotenska, L. Ovsiankina, T. Smyrnova, O. Rasskazova, L. Cherednyk, M. Doichyk // Postmodern Openings, 2022. – 13(1). – P. 291–312 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The problem of tolerance is analyzed against the background of the acute challenges of today and transformation of humanities from antiquity to postmodernism. Tolerance-related definitions arose in philosophy are examined retrospectively: patience, tolerance, respect, trust, harmony in diversity. The methodological significance of the integrative interdisciplinary prism in consideration of the phenomenon of tolerance is shown. Three leading sociocultural and communicative strategies of tolerance in social agreements have been identified: tolerant internal dialogue (agreement with oneself), tolerant communication with the world (worldview tolerance), tolerant interpersonal communication (important social agreements). The limits of tolerance are outlined, beyond which it becomes quasi-tolerance, because behind the simulacrum of tolerance hides indifference, conformism of communicators, or sprouts of intolerance, aggression, mobbing. With the help of sociological and synergetic theories the idea of balance of tolerance in psychological, mental and spiritual, physical aspects of human existence is defended. Autotolerance is due to human self-knowledge, sound self-esteem, developed mental and emotional quotient (EQ), and under such conditions it strategically determines a tolerant dialogue with the world, a constructive worldview. In turn, it needs critical thinking and an ecological attitude to information, especially in the context of media manipulation and phubbing. The simulacrum of modern pop literature on positive thinking is outlined, in contrast to which the life-creating potential of practical philosophy is revealed, which contributes to creation of socio-cultural and communicative communities | en_US |
dc.subject | толерантність, внутрішній діалог, аутотолерантність, толерантний світогляд, міжособистісне спілкування, практична філософія, соціальна згода, консенсус | en_US |
dc.subject | tolerance, internal dialogue, autotolerance, tolerant worldview, interpersonal communication, practical philosophy, social consent, consensus | en_US |
dc.title | Tolerance as a Communicative and Socio-Cultural Strategy of Social Agreements | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Статті |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
statty-4.pdf | 394.92 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.